Re: Dragonball AF

by Hawttdawgg Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:04 pm

I know, but if someone can make a new anime/manga that is "between" DBZ and DBAF.. Then it would be awesome

GT > AF > E

by secor Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:44 pm

theres no way im reading all that right now, but AF would be ill.

ok so it first started as a rumor until somebody came out and said it was April Fools, but then the fans were like fuck that we always wanted more db, and apparently started writing it.

it would be ill but whatever

what they should do is start all over after gt with gokus great great grandson GOKU, bleh. if you saw the special they did with goku n pan u could definitely see how they could continue the story starting off exactly how db started. it would be perfect

by Jessica Raine Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:46 pm

no. three words:
The Roshi Show.

'nuff said.

by lol1991 Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:54 pm

the Roshi show...yes...

by Jessica Raine Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:06 pm

so it's settled, we must devote ourselves to making sure the roshi show sees the light of day as soon as we're done preventing DBLAMs

by justinlynch3 Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:45 pm

I hope so...
"GT is not cannon."
I hear that a lot. Contrary to popular belief Toriyama was involved in its creation, to me that's the most important.

Toriyama involvement was very little in GT. I think he did the art work for SSJ4 or something of that nature, he had nothing to do with the story.

ok so it first started as a rumor until somebody came out and said it was April Fools, but then the fans were like fuck that we always wanted more db, and apparently started writing it.

April Fools is still what it's refered to. All it is is fan manga, it'll never be part of DB.

by Jessica Raine Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:46 pm

glad af is not real~

by Chulance Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:39 pm

AF could be great if it was done properly and could have a good ending like Z instead of the horrible one GT had.

by ningen Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:49 am

justinlynch3 wrote:
I hope so...
"GT is not cannon."
I hear that a lot. Contrary to popular belief Toriyama was involved in its creation, to me that's the most important.

Toriyama involvement was very little in GT. I think he did the art work for SSJ4 or something of that nature, he had nothing to do with the story.

I know that he wasn't involved much, that stands. But people believe that he wasn't involved at all, and take that to build their arguments. As for the story, he gave them some guidelines and advices, all minor, but still nobody can't say he wasn't involved.

by justinlynch3 Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:56 am

ningen wrote:
justinlynch3 wrote:
I hope so...
"GT is not cannon."
I hear that a lot. Contrary to popular belief Toriyama was involved in its creation, to me that's the most important.

Toriyama involvement was very little in GT. I think he did the art work for SSJ4 or something of that nature, he had nothing to do with the story.
I know that he wasn't involved much, that stands. But people believe that he wasn't involved at all, and take that to build their arguments. As for the story, he gave them some guidelines and advices, all minor, but still nobody can't say he wasn't involved.

True enough.

I'm willing to admit his involment, but GT is still Tieo... Teio... whoever that guy is... work. Toriyama may of gave a character art and some quick guildlines, but he was basiclly finished with the series by then.

This is why GT sucks compared to Z, the characters are annoying, most of the story is not that great, it just doesn't have as much thought put in it. It has a few good moments, but that's it.

by ningen Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:22 am

I agree.
It does have its moments, and, of course, its bad sides.
I don't like to see people reject it completely, that's all, although that's up to them.

by justinlynch3 Tue Mar 10, 2009 5:31 pm

I can watch it, probly wouldn't buy it.

by Sponsored content

DBAF or DBE?